This site is a Work In Progress

Author

J

Blogs

Above The Chaos

Books

Lionsberg Wiki Books

United States Congressional UAP Hearings (2024)

Introduction

The 2024 United States Congressional hearings on UFOs, officially referred to as UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena), marked another critical moment in government disclosure efforts surrounding this controversial subject. Following the momentum of 2023, these hearings featured testimony from whistleblowers, government officials, scientists, and journalists. The proceedings illuminated alleged clandestine programs, whistleblower protections, and the enduring mystery of non-human technologies.

Key Dates and Structure

  • Date: November 13, 2024
  • Location: House Oversight Committee Hearing Room, Washington, D.C.
  • Chair: Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC)
  • Primary Witnesses:
    • Michael Shellenberger (Investigative Journalist)
    • David Grusch (Whistleblower and Former Intelligence Officer)
    • Additional unnamed whistleblowers submitting classified testimony.

Notable Testimonies

Michael Shellenberger

  • Presented a whistleblower report alleging the existence of a secret UAP-related program titled “Immaculate Constellation.”
  • Described evidence of significant UAP data being held outside the oversight of Congress.
  • Discussed whistleblower fears of retaliation and emphasized the urgent need for transparency.

David Grusch

  • Reiterated claims made in 2023, emphasizing the existence of a clandestine crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program.
  • Stated that "the U.S. government and defense contractors have recovered multiple craft of non-human origin."
  • Testified about barriers to oversight, including the classification of programs as Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs).

Classified Whistleblower Testimonies

  • Several whistleblowers submitted classified reports, including visual and radar data related to UAPs.
  • Alleged ongoing efforts to conceal the existence of such programs from Congressional committees.

Major Topics Discussed

1. Whistleblower Protections

  • The hearings highlighted the importance of protecting individuals revealing classified UAP information.
  • Testimonies emphasized fears of career-ending retaliation and physical harm.
  • Discussions centered on whether current whistleblower protections adequately covered those coming forward about UAPs.

2. Allegations of Clandestine Programs

  • Witnesses alleged that UAP-related activities were shielded from oversight through USAPs.
  • The program “Immaculate Constellation” was named as an alleged central repository of UAP data.
  • Claims included secretive crash retrievals, reverse engineering, and the concealment of technologies potentially transformative for humanity.

3. Scientific and Military Implications

  • Testimonies included reports of advanced technologies defying known physics, such as:
    • Objects traveling at hypersonic speeds without visible propulsion.
    • Craft performing instant directional changes.
    • Radar invisibility and advanced material composition.
  • Military witnesses reported encounters with objects demonstrating these capabilities.

4. Congressional Oversight Challenges

  • Persistent barriers to oversight were noted, including:
    • Classification levels exceeding those accessible to most members of Congress.
    • Non-disclosure agreements imposed on witnesses.
    • Deliberate misclassification or obfuscation of UAP-related programs.

Pentagon Response

  • The Department of Defense denied the existence of any programs titled "Immaculate Constellation" or similarly concealed UAP activities.
  • Sue Gough, Pentagon spokesperson, reiterated that all known UAP activities were reported to AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office).
  • Former officials, including Sean Kirkpatrick, expressed skepticism regarding the whistleblower claims.

Public Reaction and Media Coverage

  • Public interest soared following the hearings, with polarized reactions:
    • Supporters: Viewed the hearings as a historic step toward full disclosure.
    • Skeptics: Criticized the lack of physical evidence presented and raised concerns about potential misinformation.
  • Major media outlets covered the hearings extensively, often highlighting the tension between whistleblower claims and government denials.

Outcome and Next Steps

  1. Follow-Up Investigations:

    • The Oversight Committee announced plans to pursue further investigations into UAP-related activities.
    • Requests for declassification of UAP-related materials were renewed.

  2. Potential Legislation:

    • Proposed reforms to whistleblower protections specific to UAP disclosures.
    • Suggestions for a dedicated Congressional subcommittee on UAP phenomena.

  3. Increased Transparency:

    • A push for greater public access to information held by AARO and related entities.
    • Calls for the release of classified whistleblower reports, where feasible, without compromising national security.

Conclusion

The 2024 Congressional hearings continued to shed light on the enigmatic UAP phenomenon, highlighting both progress in transparency and the persistence of secrecy. As allegations of hidden programs and advanced technologies remain unverified, the hearings underscored the need for ongoing investigation, accountability, and public engagement in addressing the profound questions surrounding humanity's place in the cosmos.

See Controlled Disclosure