This site is a Work In Progress

Author

J

Blogs

Above The Chaos

Books

Lionsberg Wiki Books

The Wilson-Davis Memo Leak (2019)

Introduction

The Wilson-Davis Memo, leaked in 2019, refers to alleged notes taken by astrophysicist Dr. Eric Davis documenting a 2002 conversation with former Admiral Thomas R. Wilson, then the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). These notes, often referred to as the "Wilson-Davis documents," describe Wilson’s purported discovery of a deeply classified program involving reverse engineering of non-human technology. If authentic, which researchers such as George Knapp have confirmed, the memo provides a rare glimpse into the U.S. government's clandestine efforts to study advanced, possibly extraterrestrial technology and its compartmentalization within private industry.

Background

  1. Key Figures:

    • Admiral Thomas R. Wilson:
      • A high-ranking U.S. Navy officer and former Director of the DIA.
      • Allegedly became aware of a classified reverse-engineering program during his tenure as J-2, the Director of Intelligence for the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
    • Dr. Eric W. Davis:
      • A renowned astrophysicist and defense contractor, associated with programs like AAWSAP and AATIP.
      • Allegedly met with Wilson in 2002 to discuss the classified program.

  2. The Memo's Emergence:

    • First leaked online in April 2019, the memo was included in documents associated with the estate of the late Dr. Edgar Mitchell, an Apollo 14 astronaut and prominent UAP disclosure advocate.
    • Its contents quickly became a focal point for UAP researchers, generating both intrigue and skepticism.

Key Claims in the Memo

  1. Discovery of a Secret Program:

    • Wilson reportedly uncovered a Special Access Program (SAP) during a routine review of classified projects.
    • The program was allegedly managed by a private aerospace contractor and involved the reverse engineering of non-human technology.

  2. Denial of Access:

    • Wilson claimed he was denied access to the program, despite his high security clearance and role as J-2.
    • The program's administrators allegedly stated that he did not have a "need to know."

  3. Reverse Engineering of Non-Human Technology:

    • The memo describes Wilson’s understanding that the SAP involved attempts to reverse engineer a craft of unknown origin.
    • The craft was reportedly not of human design and was described as "technological, not natural."

  4. Extreme Secrecy and Compartmentalization:

    • Wilson expressed frustration over the program’s compartmentalization and its lack of oversight by traditional government structures.
    • The memo suggests that the program operated under the guise of private-sector projects to evade scrutiny.

  5. Acknowledgement of Crashed Craft:

    • The memo includes references to "crash retrievals" and advanced technology recovery, which aligns with claims made by other whistleblowers and researchers.

Reactions and Controversy

  1. Wilson’s Denial:

    • Admiral Wilson has publicly denied the authenticity of the memo, stating he never had such a conversation with Dr. Davis.
    • He also denied knowledge of or involvement in any reverse-engineering program involving non-human technology.

  2. Support from UAP Researchers:

    • Prominent UAP investigators, including Richard Dolan and Dr. Hal Puthoff, have suggested the memo aligns with longstanding claims of hidden crash retrieval programs.
    • Dr. Davis has declined to confirm or deny the memo’s authenticity, further fueling speculation.

  3. Skepticism:

    • Critics argue the memo lacks verifiable evidence and point out inconsistencies in Wilson’s purported statements.
    • Some suggest the memo could be a forgery or an exaggerated account of informal conversations.

Key Questions Raised

  1. Existence of the Program:
    • Does a classified program for reverse engineering non-human technology exist, as alleged in the memo?
  2. Private Sector Involvement:
    • How deeply embedded are private contractors in managing UAP-related projects, and what level of government oversight exists?
  3. National Security and Transparency:
    • What are the implications of such programs for national security, and should they be subject to greater Congressional or public oversight?

Impact on UAP Disclosure

  1. Catalyst for Public Interest:
    • The leak intensified calls for transparency regarding UAP programs and their management by both government and private entities.
  2. Support for Whistleblowers:
    • The memo provided context for subsequent whistleblower claims, including those made by David Grusch in 2023 about crash retrieval programs.
  3. Focus on Compartmentalization:
    • The memo highlights the extreme compartmentalization and secrecy surrounding potential UAP-related initiatives, raising questions about accountability.

Conclusion

The Wilson-Davis Memo remains a pivotal document in the realm of UAP research. While its authenticity and claims have not been conclusively verified, the memo has amplified scrutiny of secretive U.S. government and private-sector activities concerning advanced, potentially non-human technologies. Whether a genuine account or a compelling and near-truthful narrative, the Wilson-Davis Memo underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in understanding humanity’s interaction with the unknown.