PDG - Construction at the Site Level

3.3 Construction at the Site Level

Construction covers a spectrum from slow, certain, and simple projects to quick, uncertain, and complex projects. For the former, a manufacturing strategy is appropriate. For dynamic projects, a manufacturing strategy is insufficient -- we must learn to manage uncertainty and complexity within the characteristic conditions of site production, unique product, and temporary organization.

Construction requires implementation of four core responsibilities:

  • Site management: coordination of work including logistics, work structuring, managing work flows, orientation, quality and safety control, budget and schedule management
  • Site operations: coordination of on-site teams to maximize production, day to day operations, site security, information management
  • Required Reporting: collection, storage and dissemination of data to the CPR, the Courts and the public
  • Community Engagement: including CEQA measures, environmental mitigation, community issues

3.3.1 Site Management

Managing the Work

Coordination of thousands of trades craftspersons. Traditionally performed by the general contractor in accordance with a piecework schedule. On this project, work coordinated to maximize workflow. All parties responsible for receiving work ready for their efforts and passing on work acceptable to follow-on trades. Work flow determined through pull planning sessions and managed by each trades foreman as "Last Planners."

The Last Planner System

The Last Planners are the people on site leading a crew who know how to get work done. They organize personnel, tools, equipment and materials and establish time goals. They work with other foremen to sequence work efficiently for the project's success. They can expect areas are ready when handed to them and are responsible to other trades when they hand off their work.

Planning is defining what needs to be done and how; control is making it happen. The goal is predictable workflows from reliable commitments.

Four Levels of Planning:

  1. SHOULD: What should be done (milestone schedule, pull planning)
  2. CAN: What can be done (constraint analysis, look-ahead)
  3. WILL: What will be done (commitments from Last Planners)
  4. DID: What was completed and what was learned

The result: predictable work flow from one crew to the next, reducing waste.

LPS Process Steps:

Pull Planning:

  • Phases scheduled collaboratively at least six weeks ahead
  • Planning starts from milestone, working backwards
  • Team makes clear requests and reliable commitments
  • Handoff expectations defined and confirmed
  • Float or "phase buffer" allocated by the team

Look-ahead Planning:

  • Weekly, each team looks six weeks ahead to identify and remove constraints
  • Constraint analysis performed when tasks first enter the look-ahead window
  • Material availability confirmed electronically and verbally
  • Repetitive processes captured in standard sequences
  • Constraint removal assigned and tracked

Commitment Planning:

  • Daily plans made by first-level supervisors from released, constraint-free tasks
  • Daily plans logged at end of each day with Percentage of Promises Calculated
  • Reasons for plan failure identified

Learning:

  • Perform 5 Why analysis on plan failures
  • Identify actions to prevent reoccurrence
  • Three questions: What should we stop doing? What should we keep doing? What should we start doing?

Implementation Notes:

  • Multiple Plans per site (4-15 separate systems)
  • Right size each planning session (~8 participants)
  • Appropriate balance between "big room" and decentralization
  • Monthly Six Month Look-ahead facilitated meeting
  • Milestones showing pre-construction and construction activities

Site Logistics / Materials Workflows

Five standard logistics workflows for material delivery:

  • Flow A: Material Direct to Site and placed at Point-of-use or Staging Area
  • Flow B: Kitted by Trade, Delivered to Point-of-use
  • Flow C: Kitted by 3rd Party Logistics Company, Delivered to Point-of-use
  • Flow D: Use of 3rd Party Logistics Warehouse, Material delivered to Point-of-use
  • Flow E: Vendor Managed Inventory (Min/Max System)

Just-In-Time / Point of Use: Materials delivered just-in-time to minimize waste. While JIT is the stretch goal, not every scope benefits. For large Trade Partners (mechanical, electrical, steel, casework), JIT should be attainable.

Buffers and Variability: Buffers include time, capacity, and inventory. Reducing variability reduces time and cost. An example buffer: "deliver today, what you need tomorrow, for installation the following day."

Material Classifications: Engineered to Order (ETO), Made to Order (MTO), Made to Stock (MTS), Consumables, Long Lead Items.

Prefabrication and Kitting: Bundling complete packages of materials for a unit of work. Kits can include specialty tools. Allows adjustment of daily quantities.

Vendor Managed Inventory: A site store where multiple Trade Partners purchase consumables. Min/max quantities determined for each item.

Central Materials Management Team (CMMT): Manages deliveries, inspections, staging. Responsible for implementing work flows, training Trade Partners, managing 3PL and VMI providers, executing processes, and implementing continuous improvements.

Inventory Management System (IMS): Web-based software tracking material throughout the supply chain. Provides program-wide transparency and visibility. Each material delivery identified by unique barcode. Logistics metrics developed from data: on-time delivery, scheduled deliveries, average days onsite, rejected materials.

Standard Work

Baseline or best practice for producing reliable processes. Applies to:

  • Materials Handling
  • Machine Work
  • Hand Work

Focus first on highly repeatable processes or those with high quality/safety implications. Standard work can be output of First Run Studies.

Quality and Safety in Action

The Core Team monitors and enforces the Built in Quality Plan including First Run Studies, Standard Work, Error Proofing, Zero-Defects Policy, ROY System, Lessons Learned, Managing the Commons.

Safety monitored including Leadership Commitment, Management Involvement, Safety Priority, Worker Empowerment, Good Catches, Incident Investigations, BIM Flagging Protocols.

Budget and Schedule Management

Target Cost closely monitored with weekly updates of actual expenses. Cost Controls, Payment Processing, and Reporting managed through the WBS-based Cost Management System. Value stream costing used to identify costs for all process steps providing value to the customer.

Site Closeout

The IPD/Lean approach fosters sufficient planning and collaboration for a proper closeout:

  • Identification and correction of trade damage post-installation
  • Attic Stock management
  • Operations manuals for systems
  • Instructional training for operations and maintenance
  • Records Retention Management
  • Commissioning of the facility
  • Handoffs to operations personnel

The Core Group begins planning closeout near the beginning of construction.

Example #1: "First time" Quality can eliminate punch lists and rework. Comparable to Toyota's "andon cord" -- when anyone sees a defect they stop the production line and correct it on the spot.

Example #2: "Optimizing the whole" and incentivizing trade partners can eliminate claims. The parties' energies focused on achieving the Owner's goals holistically. Goal: claims-free projects.


Previous: PDG - Site Adapt
Next: PDG - Conclusion and Prototype Control
Return to The Program Delivery Guide