Individuals have the moral obligation to Object if they reasonably believe that the Group will be unable to achieve its Aim if a given Proposal is Enacted.
Any member of a Group has the right and responsibility to stop Progress and require improvement of the Proposal before it can advance if the Proposal will cause Harm.
Objections should be framed relative to Progress towards the Aim of the Group, in the the context of the Progress of The Whole towards The Goal.
The Objection should address how the Proposal would Harm the ability of the Group or The Whole to advance towards its Aim.
Individuals should balance their Preference and Range of Tolerance, and use Wisdom to Discern when to Object, and when to accept something that varies from Preference but is acceptably within their Range of Tolerance.
As a general rule, the greater the Span of Impact of a Decision, the more Time the Group should be willing to spend to move beyond the lower standard of Consent, towards the higher standard of Consensus that is always available with enough Wisdom, Time and Patience.